Consensus Layer of Bitcoin

No direct influence: Bitcoin’s consensus mechanism, which depends on SHA-256 and ECDSA, wouldn’t be instantly affected by the cracking of AES, because it doesn’t use AES for its core features.

Person’s Bitcoin Wallets

Oblique influence on pockets safety: Main {hardware} wallets (Trezor, Ledger, KeepKey) give attention to safe key storage and bodily machine integrity quite than AES encryption. Subsequently, the direct influence on these wallets could be minimal.

Bitcoin Availability for Theft

Restricted direct danger: The quantity of Bitcoin in danger wouldn’t instantly enhance as a consequence of AES being compromised, as Bitcoin addresses and keys don’t depend on AES. The publicity of full public keys from handle reuse poses a danger provided that ECDSA is compromised. (Observe that bitcoin can nonetheless be safe underneath cracked ECDSA, however any handle which has a spent transaction output may have its non-public key uncovered)

Bitcoin’s Future Submit-Occasion

No protocol change is critical for AES.
Since Bitcoin’s core protocol doesn’t rely upon AES, cracking AES wouldn’t necessitate a protocol change or perhaps a gentle fork for Bitcoin’s operations. Nonetheless, peripheral methods utilizing AES could have to improve their safety (e.g. some wallets similar to Bitcoin Core).

So in abstract, peripheral safety measures may want reevaluation, however the main mechanisms of Bitcoin stay safe towards an AES compromise.