The authorized duel between the USA Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) and Kraken, a number one cryptocurrency alternate, appears like one other misguided try by the SEC to exert management over an trade that basically challenges an outdated regulatory playbook. The company’s lawsuit, filed in November, accuses Kraken of working as an unregistered securities alternate.

The lawsuit isn’t only a repeat of the SEC’s previous failures. It’s additionally a obtrusive instance of regulatory overreach that fails to understand the essence of cryptocurrency. It mirrors the company’s actions in opposition to Coinbase, which mark a sample of aggressive regulation that’s each ineffectual and counterproductive. In its case in opposition to Coinbase, the SEC allegations equally concerned working as an unregistered securities alternate. The method basically misunderstands the character of cryptocurrency exchanges.

The lawsuit isn’t only a repeat of the SEC’s previous failures. It’s additionally a obtrusive instance of regulatory overreach that fails to understand the essence of cryptocurrency. It mirrors the company’s actions in opposition to Coinbase, which mark a sample of aggressive regulation that’s each ineffectual and counterproductive. In its case in opposition to Coinbase, the SEC allegations equally concerned working as an unregistered securities alternate. The method basically misunderstands the character of cryptocurrency exchanges.

Associated: Anticipate some crypto corporations to fail within the wake of Bitcoin’s halving

Not like conventional securities exchanges, platforms like Kraken provide a various vary of digital belongings that don’t match neatly into the securities framework. This misclassification by the SEC reveals a lack of information of the distinctive traits of cryptocurrencies, which operate as decentralized belongings, usually with utility or currency-like options somewhat than standard securities.

One of the crucial placing points is the absence of technological neutrality — the precept that regulatory frameworks ought to apply equally to all types of know-how, with out favoring or penalizing any specific one. By forcing cryptocurrencies into the normal securities mould, the SEC just isn’t solely misapplying legal guidelines but additionally exhibiting a transparent bias in opposition to digital belongings. This lack of neutrality not solely hinders innovation but additionally unfairly targets platforms which might be striving to work inside the regulatory panorama.

The SEC’s aggressive stance dangers driving enterprise away from the U.S. to extra crypto-friendly jurisdictions. This phenomenon, often called regulatory arbitrage, may outcome within the U.S. dropping its place as a pacesetter in technological innovation. The crypto trade is international, and extreme regulation in a single nation merely pushes companies to relocate, taking their financial advantages and improvements with them.

Associated: 3 theses that may drive Ethereum and Bitcoin within the subsequent bull market

The Kraken lawsuit is about to grow to be one other instance of the SEC’s failure to efficiently regulate the crypto trade, akin to the result of its actions in opposition to Coinbase. This repetitive cycle of aggressive and misinformed regulation just isn’t solely futile but additionally dangerous to the credibility of the SEC. It sends a message that the regulatory physique is extra serious about flexing its regulatory muscle than in understanding and adapting to new technological paradigms.

The case isn’t simply an remoted authorized battle. It’s indicative of a broader concern inside the U.S. regulatory framework’s method to cryptocurrencies. The SEC should transfer past its present, outdated techniques and have interaction with the crypto trade in a extra knowledgeable and constructive method. Regulation is important, nevertheless it have to be affordable, well-informed, and designed to foster innovation, not stifle it.

It appears the SEC is about for one more resounding defeat, which is able to function another reminder of the necessity for a brand new method by regulators.

This text is for basic data functions and isn’t meant to be and shouldn’t be taken as authorized or funding recommendation. The views, ideas and opinions expressed listed here are the writer’s alone and don’t essentially replicate or signify the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.